
One glance and it’s obvious the bathtub curve is just as pertinent to the life cycle of hydraulic components as it is to humans or electronic devices. And in a hydraulics maintenance context, it’s useful for framing our expectations and objectives. For example, we should accept that there will be some level of random failures resulting from manufacturing defects and circuit design faults. There’s not much we can do about manufacturing defects in a maintenance environment. But where analysis of a random failure indicates a circuit design fault, this can and should be rectified to prevent recurring failures.

The Life Cycle Bathtub Curve For Hydraulic Components (Wikipedia).
In order to ‘flatten’ the bathtub and reduce the Observed Failure Rate, it’s necessary to flatten both the Infant Mortality Failure and Wear Out Failure curves. And when it comes to hydraulic components, maintenance has a significant influence. Hydraulic components are highly susceptible to having their ultimate service life compromised by improper installation and commissioning. But this is controllable. To the point where the only Infant Mortality Failures that are acceptable are those that result from a manufacturing defect or a circuit design fault. And as already stated, an infant mortality failure resulting from a circuit design fault should only be allowed to occur once on that machine.
Wear Out Failures are, to some extent, the nature of the beast. But there is much that can (and must) be done if this curve is to be as low and flat as possible. For hydraulic components this has many dimensions. It would be wonderful if it could be conveniently encapsulated by one task or thing. I have managed to condense it down into a 146-page book, The Hydraulic Maintenance Handbook, but that’s as simple as it gets. That said, anything you do to defer the otherwise inevitable ramp of Wear Out Failures is a step in the right direction. And reading “Six Costly Mistakes Most Hydraulics Users Make… And How You Can Avoid Them!” is a great place to start.